Ultra-High-Net-Worth Investors: Preparing for What's Ahead
Consider the future and how to make your wealth work on your behalf
Consider the future and how to make your wealth work on your behalf
Consider the future and how to make your wealth work on your behalf
We have observed some typical needs and considerations faced by those with substantial wealth. These needs broadly result from one's goals and the thought processes, resources, and structures to maximize a family's satisfaction. Here we discuss some of those needs and approaches used to achieve them.
We have observed some typical needs and considerations faced by those with substantial wealth. These needs broadly result from one's goals and the thought processes, resources, and structures to maximize a family's satisfaction. Here we discuss some of those needs and approaches used to achieve them.
In general, we find that wealthy individuals and families often express or seek some combination of the following attributes (in no particular order):
Occasional large capital purchases for personal and aesthetic enjoyment (house, boat, art, etc.)
Ongoing annual expenses for living/lifestyle and overhead
Support for family, especially their children, during the parents’ lifetime and beyond
Philanthropic interests and activities, again during their lifetimes and potentially beyond
Given the above, an investment goal of generating sufficient returns (after investment costs and taxes) to support outlays and protect and grow portfolio value over time
An ongoing ownership interest in their foundational business/asset/activity (usually the source of the original wealth) and a potential need to divest/diversify this over time
Comfort accepting tax obligations but with a desire to structure and manage affairs to minimize avoidable tax “leakage”
Freeing up time for high-priority activities and interests, often translating into a desire for administrative and advisory support. In other words, increasing focus on what matters while avoiding unnecessary burdens
A long-term view, including with respect to investment horizon, and as a result, some tolerance for near-term volatility and illiquidity if part of a careful plan to manage risk
Greater simplicity, wherever possible
But, on balance, the goals and preferences outlined above merit consideration of:
including the benefits and drawbacks of trust and other structures
including benefits and drawbacks of a foundation
to organize, protect and optimize capital purchases and investment activities
with access to best-of-class strategies and managers across all asset classes, including private, non-tradable investments
Some of the activities above are up-front exercises with only an occasional need for review and updating, while others are ongoing.
Generally, one-time or episodic needs for advice or execution are also those that require the most specialized expertise. These almost always involve engaging third-party expert professionals – e.g. attorneys and accountants – as the most effective route for estate planning (and legal structure more generally) and tax matters.
While often more expensive from an hourly perspective (vs. in-house), outside experts are a variable cost and offer two additional benefits. Their specific expertise is often more current due to their work serving other clients on similar issues, and they can add additional professional resources when needed (“power-by-the-hour”).
Thus, the depth of support and engagement with philanthropic activities or managing personal property, for example, will depend entirely on where such things sit in your hierarchy of priorities.
On the other hand, administrative support is almost always needed and ongoing. These activities often include basic things like book-keeping, bill-paying and paperwork, among others. Universally, our clients want to free up time from tasks like these, so it’s an early area of focus.
Its strategy, oversight and implementation (managed internally or by outside advisors), should be a broad-scope and dynamic activity involving:
(i.e., what types of assets to own, and in what proportion) considering available client capital - especially if it may be affected by a significant transaction (such as the sale of a concentrated asset) - and prevailing market conditions
Given the scale, resources and intense focus required, outside specialist portfolio managers should be responsible for individual investments within their niches
Providing an integrated picture of exposures and performance of the entire, holistic portfolio, regardless of source or management responsibility
Only the very largest Family Offices – of perhaps $2 billion or more of investible assets, in our estimation – may have sufficient scale to merit hiring an in-house team of investment professionals and related staff to carry out all these functions. So private families and individuals are usually best served by using a third-party investment advisory firm, which in turn researches and recommends specialist portfolio managers.
Expert professionals naturally tend to “stay in their lanes,” often leaving a client to seek advice from various perspectives (such as whether to sell an asset and incur taxable gains to achieve potentially higher returns). So, the principals (individuals or families) must develop and communicate an overarching vision of their goals and priorities to guide those professionals developing, weighing and integrating advice to achieve the best result.
As another example, consider cash flows. Decisions about the types of investments, their proportions, specific characteristics, liquidity, and resulting anticipated investment cash flows may influence distributions and the ability to support the owners’ lifestyle and other plans. Therefore, investment decisions must reflect the principals’ vision. Similarly, when designing investment strategies and plans, investment advisors should seek input from tax advisors when selecting specific investment vehicles (e.g., onshore vs. offshore) and their place in your ownership structure based on the mix of expected return from the underlying investments (e.g. income versus capital gains).
The key concept is a “hub” to connect the various experts at the ends of the “spokes.” You, dedicated Family Office professional leadership, or your wealth advisor may play that central role. The selection of functional experts (including those from your existing professional relationships) should follow and be consistent with that decision.
In general, we find that wealthy individuals and families often express or seek some combination of the following attributes (in no particular order):
Occasional large capital purchases for personal and aesthetic enjoyment (house, boat, art, etc.)
Ongoing annual expenses for living/lifestyle and overhead
Support for family, especially their children, during the parents’ lifetime and beyond
Philanthropic interests and activities, again during their lifetimes and potentially beyond
Given the above, an investment goal of generating sufficient returns (after investment costs and taxes) to support outlays and protect and grow portfolio value over time
An ongoing ownership interest in their foundational business/asset/activity (usually the source of the original wealth) and a potential need to divest/diversify this over time
Comfort accepting tax obligations but with a desire to structure and manage affairs to minimize avoidable tax “leakage”
Freeing up time for high-priority activities and interests, often translating into a desire for administrative and advisory support. In other words, increasing focus on what matters while avoiding unnecessary burdens
A long-term view, including with respect to investment horizon, and as a result, some tolerance for near-term volatility and illiquidity if part of a careful plan to manage risk
Greater simplicity, wherever possible
But, on balance, the goals and preferences outlined above merit consideration of:
including the benefits and drawbacks of trust and other structures
including benefits and drawbacks of a foundation
to organize, protect and optimize capital purchases and investment activities
with access to best-of-class strategies and managers across all asset classes, including private, non-tradable investments
Some of the activities above are up-front exercises with only an occasional need for review and updating, while others are ongoing.
Generally, one-time or episodic needs for advice or execution are also those that require the most specialized expertise. These almost always involve engaging third-party expert professionals – e.g. attorneys and accountants – as the most effective route for estate planning (and legal structure more generally) and tax matters.
While often more expensive from an hourly perspective (vs. in-house), outside experts are a variable cost and offer two additional benefits. Their specific expertise is often more current due to their work serving other clients on similar issues, and they can add additional professional resources when needed (“power-by-the-hour”).
Thus, the depth of support and engagement with philanthropic activities or managing personal property, for example, will depend entirely on where such things sit in your hierarchy of priorities.
On the other hand, administrative support is almost always needed and ongoing. These activities often include basic things like book-keeping, bill-paying and paperwork, among others. Universally, our clients want to free up time from tasks like these, so it’s an early area of focus.
Its strategy, oversight and implementation (managed internally or by outside advisors), should be a broad-scope and dynamic activity involving:
(i.e., what types of assets to own, and in what proportion) considering available client capital - especially if it may be affected by a significant transaction (such as the sale of a concentrated asset) - and prevailing market conditions
Given the scale, resources and intense focus required, outside specialist portfolio managers should be responsible for individual investments within their niches
Providing an integrated picture of exposures and performance of the entire, holistic portfolio, regardless of source or management responsibility
Only the very largest Family Offices – of perhaps $2 billion or more of investible assets, in our estimation – may have sufficient scale to merit hiring an in-house team of investment professionals and related staff to carry out all these functions. So private families and individuals are usually best served by using a third-party investment advisory firm, which in turn researches and recommends specialist portfolio managers.
Expert professionals naturally tend to “stay in their lanes,” often leaving a client to seek advice from various perspectives (such as whether to sell an asset and incur taxable gains to achieve potentially higher returns). So, the principals (individuals or families) must develop and communicate an overarching vision of their goals and priorities to guide those professionals developing, weighing and integrating advice to achieve the best result.
As another example, consider cash flows. Decisions about the types of investments, their proportions, specific characteristics, liquidity, and resulting anticipated investment cash flows may influence distributions and the ability to support the owners’ lifestyle and other plans. Therefore, investment decisions must reflect the principals’ vision. Similarly, when designing investment strategies and plans, investment advisors should seek input from tax advisors when selecting specific investment vehicles (e.g., onshore vs. offshore) and their place in your ownership structure based on the mix of expected return from the underlying investments (e.g. income versus capital gains).
The key concept is a “hub” to connect the various experts at the ends of the “spokes.” You, dedicated Family Office professional leadership, or your wealth advisor may play that central role. The selection of functional experts (including those from your existing professional relationships) should follow and be consistent with that decision.
The term “Family Office” is often used with differing meanings. We view the concept of a Family Office as a network of resources and activities that serve wealthy individuals or families – its form can take many shapes. So, the questions become: what are those needs and how to create, organize and coordinate that ecosystem to best meet them?
Understand the key functions of Family Offices: which aspects are best suited to highly qualified third-party providers and which to dedicated staff. Some ways to think critically about directing and coordinating a family office network.
The term “Family Office” is often used with differing meanings. We view the concept of a Family Office as a network of resources and activities that serve wealthy individuals or families – its form can take many shapes. So, the questions become: what are those needs and how to create, organize and coordinate that ecosystem to best meet them?
Understand the key functions of Family Offices: which aspects are best suited to highly qualified third-party providers and which to dedicated staff. Some ways to think critically about directing and coordinating a family office network.
BCA is not for everyone – and we are proud of that distinction. We look for a select group of individuals (and their entities) whose financial position and preferences enable them to thrive while working with us.
We welcome your interest. Please give us at call at +1-406-556-8202 to set up a confidential exploratory consultation.