Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Trump Administration Policies and Potential Impacts on Markets

Trump Administration Policies and Potential Impacts on Markets

Relative to the outgoing Biden Administration, the incoming Trump Administration has discussed implementing significantly different policies across immigration, tariffs, taxes, and regulations. With control of both houses of Congress (albeit with a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives), Trump has a good chance of enacting much of his policy agenda. In the note below, we discuss potential policy shifts and their implications for equity markets across various geographies. We begin, however, with a note of caution. Punditry is ubiquitous (and often fun), but hazardous. Predicted themes around winners and losers (“Trump Trades” in the current parlance) often fail to come to pass. We touch on many such examples from the first Trump presidency in the Appendix. In strong market economies like the U.S., the direct effects of government policies on the economy are often delayed, indirect, or lead to unintended consequences. Long-term economic trends and unforeseen events (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic) frequently have a more substantial impact. Long-term economic trends tend to be much more important, as can “unknown unknowns” (e.g. COVID). Therefore, we adhere to our long-term investment framework, applying our tactical views with humility.

Immigration

Immigration was a central issue in Trump’s campaign, with promises to significantly reduce migrant inflows by closing the southern border and conducting mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, estimated at 10 to 12 million people. His appointments of immigration hardliners to key roles, such as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, signal a strong commitment to pursuing these aggressive policies. It is expected that the initial steps to implement these actions could be taken swiftly through executive orders shortly after the inauguration. However, these measures are likely to face legal challenges, and details about the logistics of carrying out mass deportations remain scarce. Such uncertainties may impact the feasibility and timeline of these plans.

  • We believe that immigration actions are the highest priority for the incoming administration. We forecast that Trump will procure additional funding for further completion of the Border Wall, and that there will be increased funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to increase border patrols and deportations.
  • Trump’s first administration deported 1.5mm people. Surprisingly, this was lower than deportations enacted under each of the Obama administrations (2.9mm and 1.9mm) and equivalent to those deported under the Biden administration (1.5mm). However, illegal immigration surged considerably under the Biden administration. We project that deportations will increase significantly to levels seen under the first Obama administration if not higher.

Our view

We believe the economic effects of heightened immigration enforcement will not be immediate. However, over the mid-term (2–5 years), Trump’s immigration policies could have inflationary effects, particularly in labor-dependent service industries. Other things being equal, this should lead to longer-term bond yields remaining higher for longer. The impact on US equity markets should be more muted. In the short term, the impact should be relatively limited (unless longer-term bond yields spike in anticipation of inflation pressures). Over the mid-term, there may be cost pressures on labor. However, these pressures would emerge in sectors that do not constitute significant portions of the S&P 500 index.

Tariffs

Trump has long touted tariffs as tools to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US and to negotiate better trade deals with other countries. Trump has proposed imposing tariffs on all imported goods of up to 20% and has also proposed levying tariffs on Chinese goods of up to 60%. If fully enacted, the average tariff rate would reach its highest level since the Great Depression.

  • While tariffs would increase revenues for the government and potentially benefit certain US businesses, most economists assert that tariffs would be passed on to consumers and raise prices, while reducing output and economic employment.
  • In addition, potential retaliatory actions taken by other countries and their resultant effects could be significant are hard to predict.
  • During his first term, Trump enacted a series of tariffs including: a) $250bln of tariffs on China consisting of 25% tariffs covering products ranging from electronics to consumer goods (some of these tariffs were removed after a Phase One trade deal with China was reached), b) 25% tariffs on steel and 10% tariffs on aluminum imports from most countries, and c) tariffs of 7.5% on certain goods imported from the EU such as wine, cheese, and aircraft.
  • Trump’s tariff policy during his first term generated economic friction and retaliation from many US allies and trading partners.  However, it led to some changes in trade agreements with Canada and Mexico and resulted in a Phase One deal with China. The Biden administration kept many of the Trump tariffs in place during its term.
  • The effects of Trump’s first term tariffs on US manufacturing jobs and the effectiveness in reducing the US trade deficit are still being debated.  Certain industries and businesses were affected positively, while others were impacted negatively. Overall, global growth slowed in 2019, and S&P 500 earnings were flat during that year from a combination of reduced demand and business investment due in part due to tariff uncertainty coupled with effects from a stronger dollar. The S&P 500 declined by 4.9%, US small caps declined 11.0% and international equities (MSCI ACWI ex USA index) declined by 14.2% in USD during 2018 as investors accurately assessed the upcoming slowdown in growth and corporate earnings in 2019. Equity markets across all major geographies rallied substantially in 2019 as the trade wars cooled. 

Our view

At this stage, Trump has not appointed key economic cabinet members such as the Treasury Secretary. Our base case view is that Trump will increase tariffs on Chinese goods and implement some level of broad-based import tariffs. However, we believe that he will hold short of fully implementing the measures articulated during the campaign and will threaten further escalation of tariffs as a negotiation tool. Tarriff policy and the uncertainty surrounding tariff rollouts will likely influence equity markets during 2025. Businesses may hold off on investment plans and may preorder inventory now which could lead to reduced orders in 2025 or 2026. The faster the administration rolls out the tariff policy, the easier it would be for businesses to adjust and for equity markets to assess potential effects on corporate earnings. As in 2018, we believe that US large-cap equities are better positioned relative to international equities (lower level of exports, less dependent on global trade, and better structural sectoral dynamics) to withstand escalation of tariffs and trade wars. While many economists claim that tariffs are inflationary, US inflation actually fell in 2018 and 2019 as tariffs were implemented. Additionally, the application of extreme tariffs (not our base case scenario) may lead to a global recession in which yields would decline across the curve.

Taxes

Trump has floated several tax proposals including a) extending or making permanent the corporate and individual tax cuts included in his signature 2017 Tax and Jobs Act which is set to expire by the end of 2025, b) reducing the federal tax rate for corporations from 21% (was previously 35% prior to the 2017 Act) to 15%, and c) various other measures including exempting tips and overtime wages from taxation. An independent non-partisan analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projected that Trump’s tax and spending plans would add $7.75 trillion to the US federal deficit by 2035 (their range of estimates was very wide with deficit addition ranging between $1.7 trillion to $15.6 trillion). Trump and his advisors refute this analysis and believe that additional economic growth resulting from the tax cuts coupled with tariff revenue would generally have a neutral impact to the deficit.

  • Trump’s first term tax cuts were highly beneficial for publicly traded US corporations and for small and medium sized private businesses.  S&P 500 earnings increased by 20% in 2018, with lower corporate tax rates contributing 55% of the earnings growth.
  • The Congressional Budget Office projected that Trump’s tax cuts would add $1.5 trillion to the deficit over 10 years as they were unfunded (not matched by spending cuts). As the Tax Act was implemented in 2018, the annual deficit modestly widened from $0.67 trillion in 2017 to $0.98 through 2019. The deficit then peaked at $3.1 trillion in 2020 as emergency COVID stimulus was deployed, before declining to $1.8 trillion in 2024 (reflecting additional stimulus measures enacted by the Biden administration). 

Our view

We believe that the tax provisions under the 2017 Tax and Jobs Act will either be extended or made permanent by the new Congress. Obtaining further tax reduction may prove more difficult given the current high deficit level and economists’ projections of material increases in the deficit going forward. If the corporate tax rate is further reduced, that would be beneficial to US equities, potentially increasing earnings by roughly 3%-5%.

Regulations

Trump has espoused a limited government philosophy and is likely to enact significant rollbacks of existing Biden administration regulations. Trump champions US energy dominance and seeks to make the US independent of foreign sources. His administration is likely to speed up reviews for permits associated with infrastructure projects. Trump is also expected to reverse the Biden administration’s light-duty vehicle emissions standards, which he refers to as an electric vehicle mandate. Trump is also likely to remove some regulations for banks to make it easier to lend to individual and corporate clients. In addition, the Trump administration is widely expected to be more friendly with regards to corporate mergers and acquisitions, whereas the Biden administration had become increasingly hostile to M&A. Finally, Trump has appointed an external department headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to review federal agency budgets and trim costs. This department is likely to recommend measures that cut costs and reduce red tape.

Our view

We believe that Trump will rollback several regulations impacting the energy and financial sectors. Additionally, the regulatory environment for M&A should improve considerably. Overall, these actions should lead to increased investor sentiment and are likely beneficial for US equities. They may lead to a broadening of performance beyond the Magnificent Seven, whose performance has dominated the broader market for the past two years.

Summary

US corporate earnings growth seems poised to accelerate in 2025 as the US economy remains strong, international economic growth is increasing from low base levels, and monetary policy is becoming more accommodative with lower interest rates anticipated. While the S&P 500 valuation is high at 22x forward earnings, this valuation is still much lower than the 27x forward earnings reached at the peak of the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s. With a strong economy and accommodative monetary policy, the outlook for US equities is still reasonably favorable. Historically, equities have performed well when the Fed has cut rates while the economy is growing as opposed to in recession. Valuation is a potential constraint on outsized gains, and there may be volatility as the market absorbs Trump policies and their impacts. On balance, Trump’s pro-growth policies of lower taxes and reduced regulation should be beneficial for US equities. During his first term, the S&P 500 appreciated by 57.8% cumulatively (15.6% annualized) from November 8, 2016, through December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID). However, the potential application of tariffs presents a large wildcard for equity markets as the magnitude of tariff enactment and likely retaliatory actions are difficult to predict. The resultant impact on corporate earnings is also difficult to forecast as companies may shift or delay investment and inventory plans. Trump’s tariff plans, as they are announced, could significantly increase equity market volatility over the balance of 2024 and 2025. We believe the bond market will serve as a natural check on certain policies, as equity markets have shown sensitivity to rising bond yields, often stumbling when the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield approaches 5.0%. Trump, more than other presidents, has consistently referred to the stock market as a key measure of economic success. For instance, in 2018, he retreated from increasing tariffs when equity markets declined. Recently, stronger-than-expected U.S. economic performance and a plateau in inflation declines have driven interest rates higher across the yield curve. This has led bond markets to adjust their outlook, now predicting a slower pace of Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2025 compared to expectations from just a few months ago. Since mid-September, the 10-year Treasury yield has risen from lows of 3.7% to around 4.4%. This increase reflects a combination of robust economic growth and market perceptions that Trump’s policies could contribute to higher inflation over time. While it is extremely early post the election and specific Trump policies will take time to materialize, we have the following views: 

  • Maintain overall public equities exposure, but shift towards US overweight especially during S&P 500 pullbacks (tax considerations regarding capital gains need to be considered).  US exceptionalism should continue given a) higher exposure to sectors with better structural growth, b) US companies better positioned to withstand effects from tariffs, c) US companies benefiting if the corporate tax rate is reduced further.
  • Add duration to fixed income when the 10-year yield nears 4.5% as the risk / reward becomes favorable, with a sufficiently high current income if securities are held to maturity.
  • We recommend that investors stay the course and continue to allocate to private investment strategies where appropriate.  It is important to build vintage year diversification, and several private investment strategies such as secondaries are highly compelling given the current environment.

Appendix – Equity Performance During Trump’s First Term

In the table below, we detail equity performance during Trump’s first term from post-election date (Nov 8, 2016) through the end of 2019 (prior to COVID). At a geographical level, equities performed largely as expected with the US outperforming international markets. However, within the US, winners and losers were markedly different from expectations in terms of sectoral, market-cap and style-factor performance. Additionally, the sequencing of policy action in the next Trump Administration may differ from that in 2017-2019. During his first term, Trump passed his signature Tax and Jobs Act first and then focused on tariffs. Given the high US federal deficit and high starting interest rate levels, Trump may focus on tariffs first and then turn attention to tax cuts (or focus on them simultaneously). As such, we caution investors from becoming too focused on predicting “Trump beneficiaries” at a very granular level.

  • The US handily outperformed international markets during this period.  Even so, there was considerable variation in performance by year.  In 2017 for instance, international stocks significantly outperformed as global growth resumed following a lull in 2015 and 2016.   US stocks then performed much better in 2018 and 2019 as international stocks were hurt more by tariffs and international sectors did not have as much exposure to the technology sector (best performing sector) as the US.
  • While value stocks were widely expected to benefit from Trump’s policies, US growth stocks handily outperformed value stocks over this time period.
  • Similarly, small-cap stocks were expected to benefit more than large cap stocks as small caps would benefit more from the corporate tax rate reduction that passed in 2018. However, large caps outperformed small caps by 290bps annually over the period.
  • Sectorally, the energy, industrial and financial sectors were expected to outperform given Trump’s policies.  In actuality, the technology sector was the dominant outperformer, and healthcare performed much better than expected.
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

BCA is not for everyone – and we are proud of that distinction. We look for a select group of individuals (and their entities) whose financial position and preferences enable them to thrive while working with us.

We welcome your interest. Please give us at call at +1-406-556-8202 or fill in the form below to set up a confidential exploratory consultation.